TFA Founder John Harris Explains Why Red Flag Laws Violate the Second Amendment

Apr 17, 2023

Live from Music Row, Monday morning on The Tennessee Star Report with Michael Patrick Leahy – broadcast on Nashville’s Talk Radio 98.3 and 1510 WLAC weekdays from 5:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. – host Leahy welcomed Tennessee Firearms Associations John Harris in studio to explain the meaning of red flag laws and Tennessee leaders’ misinterpretation of ‘well-regulated’ as it pertains to the Second Amendment.

Leahy: It is my great pleasure to introduce to our microphones in studio today my very good friend for many years, the founder of the Tennessee Firearms Association and a top-flight attorney here in the state of Tennessee, Mr. John Harris. Good morning, John.

Harris: Good morning. Glad to be here.

Leahy: And I also have to mention that John, along with Claudia Henneberry and I co-wrote The Star News Digital Media Guide to the Constitution and Bill of Rights for Secondary School Students. We wrote that about six years ago.

Harris: It’s been several years.

Leahy: It’s been a while. Yeah. Since we wrote that. And John, to borrow a phrase from former President Ronald Reagan, there they go again. They’re trying to do it. They’re trying to jam through red flag laws and it’s completely inexplicable to me why Governor Bill Lee thought it would be a good idea with three weeks left in this session of the Tennessee General Assembly to introduce a major bill, usually you do that at the beginning of a session, obviously in response to the expulsion brew, ha ha, and caving to political pressure. Basically, he’s introducing a red flag law. Tell our listing audience what a red flag law is and why it’s a bad deal.

Harris: Yes, a red flag law is a generic term, but it stands for any type of system where you give the government the ability to go out and seize an individual’s firearms and essentially put them on a do not sell list for government holders.

And the biggest part of the problem, and frequently there are a number of problems. But one is that these red flag laws almost always are implemented in an ex parte fashion, which means that some government officials are running around behind the scenes gathering information and securing a court order without ever giving the individual notice that they’re trying to do that.

Leahy: And so the problem is going to be if somebody doesn’t like me and they can run around behind my back and get a court order to prohibit me from owning a gun. And they can do that really for anybody. By the way, speaking of the Second Amendment, I’m just going to read it to you for the five millionth time.

It’s a beautiful sentence and it’s very clear it was passed and ratified in 1791. A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. That’s it. What’s not clear about shall not be infringed, John?

Harris: The problem is that Tennessee’s governors and our legislature don’t think that the Second Amendment applies to them, and they read that initial phrase well-regulated to mean that the government has the authority to create laws that restrict the access of the people to own or possess or even purchase guns.

We just had, as recently as two years ago, a House member Brandon Ogles who expressly said that in committee hearings that well-regulated gave them that authority. They clearly misread it as we talk in the Constitution book that well-regulated was intended to mean it is critical to the freedom that this nation is founded upon, that civilians own guns, and that they be well prepared to use them if necessary, like in the Battle of Athens, to stand up to our own government.

Just like the founders had done with England. So it’s completely the opposite of where they think that phrase was intended to lead us.

Leahy: We are in a bizarro opposite world these days, John.

Harris: Yes, we are.

Listen to today’s show highlights, including this interview:

– – –

Tune in weekdays from 5:00 – 8:00 a.m. to The Tennessee Star Reporwith Michael Patrick Leahy on Talk Radio 98.3 FM WLAC 1510. Listen online at iHeart Radio.
Photo “John Harris” by John Harris.

 

 

Activists Sheila Matthews and Amy Miller Detail Legislative Win on Tennessee Bill to Help Determine Link Between Mental Health Drugs and Mass Shooters

Activists Sheila Matthews and Amy Miller Detail Legislative Win on Tennessee Bill to Help Determine Link Between Mental Health Drugs and Mass Shooters

Sheila Matthews, co-founder of the national non-profit parent organization AbleChild, and activist Amy Miller with the Reform Pharma initiative of Children’s Health Defense, detailed the progress a bill that would help determine the link between Big Pharma drugs and mass shooters has made in the Tennessee General Assembly since its introduction.

Reporter Tom Pappert Says Tennessee Congressional Delegation ‘Fear’ Defending J6 Prisoner Ronald Colton McAbee

Reporter Tom Pappert Says Tennessee Congressional Delegation ‘Fear’ Defending J6 Prisoner Ronald Colton McAbee

Tom Pappert, lead reporter for The Tennessee Star, said members of the Tennessee congressional delegation have not shown an interest in taking up J6 prisoner Ronald Colton McAbee’s case due to the level of “fear” surrounding the overall defense of J6 defendants.

Last month, McAbee was sentenced to almost six years in prison, three years of supervised release, and ordered to pay $32,165 in restitution after being convicted and pleading guilty to six felony charges and one misdemeanor charge for being present at the U.S. Capitol on January 6.

Mike Benz Warns: The Supreme Court Needs to Exercise ‘Bravery’ in Murthy v. Missouri Case to ‘Dismantle the Government Censorship Complex’

Mike Benz Warns: The Supreme Court Needs to Exercise ‘Bravery’ in Murthy v. Missouri Case to ‘Dismantle the Government Censorship Complex’

Mike Benz, former Trump State Department official and current executive director of the Foundation for Freedom Online, said the Supreme Court is going to have to exercise “bravery” as opposed to “wisdom” in its ruling of Murthy v. Missouri for the government censorship complex to be dismantled.

Murthy v. Missouri seeks to determine whether the government’s “challenged conduct transformed private social media companies’ content-moderation decisions into state action and violated respondents’ First Amendment rights” related to COVID-19 and the 2020 presidential election.

Immigration Expert Todd Bensman Says Current Chaos in Haiti Is a Direct Result of the White House’s Decision to Repatriate Del Rio Camp Migrants in Return for Scuttled Elections

Immigration Expert Todd Bensman Says Current Chaos in Haiti Is a Direct Result of the White House’s Decision to Repatriate Del Rio Camp Migrants in Return for Scuttled Elections

Todd Bensman, senior national security fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies, said the Biden administration’s compliance in scuttling Haiti’s elections back in 2021 has resulted in the chaos currently unfolding in the Caribbean country as armed gangs have taken over.

In 2021, thousands of Haitians were deported back to Haiti from a Del Rio, Texas migrant camp allegedly in exchange for the country’s elections to be postponed at the request of unelected leader Ariel Henry, who has served as the acting Haiti Prime Minister and the acting president of Haiti since July 2021 after the assassination of President Jovenel Moïse.