Project Veritas Managing Editor Nick Givas Weighs In on Houston’s Fox 26 Whistleblower Ivory Hecker Bombshell Story

Project Veritas Managing Editor Nick Givas Weighs In on Houston’s Fox 26 Whistleblower Ivory Hecker Bombshell Story


Live from Music Row Wednesday morning on The Tennessee Star Report with Michael Patrick Leahy – broadcast on Nashville’s Talk Radio 98.3 and 1510 WLAC weekdays from 5:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. –host Leahy welcomed Project Veritas’s Managing Editor Nick Givas to the newsmakers line to discuss the recent whistleblower account of Fox 26 putting corporate sponsors and CEO mission over their viewership.

Leahy: We are joined now on our newsmaker line by Nick Givas with Project Veritas. Good morning, Nick.

Givas: Good morning. Thank you for having me.

Leahy: It’s been a busy day for you. There was a report about a Houston local television news reporter by the name of Ivory Hecker. On Monday she announced on air that she’s going to share secret recordings of Fox News with Project Veritas. She was with Fox station KRIV in Houston. Tell us what’s happened since that announcement.

Givas: Well, as you said, Ivory was suspended after she announced on air that she come forward to Project Veritas. And then following that as a live on-air that suspension, she was seemingly let go by the network or excuse me, by the affiliate Fox 26. And this is after she claimed that there were acts of “corruption” within the Houston affiliate.

And she felt that the actions were not, I guess, honoring real journalism. And she claimed that leadership prioritized corporate interest over that of the viewer. It shouldn’t shock a lot of people. But it’s certainly surprising how many of the station’s staff said these things so nonchalantly on camera.

Leahy: Now, did she bring these secret recordings to Project Veritas?

Givas: Yes, she did. She stepped forward as a whistleblower and she obtained recordings of her superiors telling her to prioritize the opinion of the station’s general manager, the company CEO, and basically anything but that of the audience.

And her quote was, ‘What’s happening within Fox Corp. is an operation of prioritizing corporate interest over the viewers’ interest, therefore operating in a deceptive way.’ And she felt that deception in her words and that corruption was enough to push her conscience to push her to come forward.

Leahy: Will Project Veritas be sharing these recordings with us publicly?

Givas: Yeah, they’ve come out. Actually, we did release the story. It is out live on and you can follow James O’Keefe on Telegram. It’s one of his main social media hubs.

We are also on Instagram. And you can read all of these quotes. You can read everything from what I just said about the viewers and the GM and the CEO being the main audience to them telling her to cease and desist as a quote posting about hydroxychloroquine, the COVID drug on social media.

They really came after here on quite a few issues it seems just because they didn’t like the outcome.

Leahy: Yeah, there it is. I can see it right now. Fox 26 TV reporter tells all to James O’Keefe. Tell our listing audience if you would Nick a little bit about Project Veritas and how I got started, James O’Keefe, and when you joined them, and what your role is there at Project Veritas.

Givas: Sure. I officially joined in March. I unofficially began working with them in January at the beginning of the year. And as managing editor of the newsroom, I help with production.

I help with recruitment of people as far as whistleblowers. I help with communications. I do interviews such as these. I go on TV, on radio, and talk to people like yourself about people such as Ivory that come out of the shadows and that risk everything to tell us their story because they trust us with it given the sailings of the mainstream media and a lot of other media outlets.

Not only to keep the identity of the person secret or to keep their story, intact but to tell the full truth on their behalf. And that’s what I try to do in my role. As far as Project Veritas itself, it started about 11 years ago now I believe. 2010 or 2011 was the official launch date. Our CEO, James O’Keefe has been muckraking ever since.

Leahy: He sure has. (Laughter)

Givas: And everybody sees it.

Leahy: Oh, there’s James O’Keefe. Let me head from the hills. I don’t want to say something that he’s going to actually report. Now, is it true that James O’Keefe and Project Veritas have been banned by Google-owned YouTube?

Givas: YouTube, I can’t speak to that. I believe we still are active on YouTube, but we were, in fact, banned from Twitter.

Leahy: Twitter, I mixed up these oligopolies. Yes, it was Twitter. Thanks for that correction.

Givas: It’s hard to tell. Sometimes it’s hard to tell them one from the other ones who I don’t blame you. We were kicked off Twitter as well as Jame’s personal account. I think, ridiculous reasons.

And firstly, the Project Veritas account was banned because they claimed we didn’t blur out a house number, even though a similar CNN video still stands today with an unblurred house number. And the reason they gave her banning James’s personal Twitter account was ridiculous.

They claimed he operated multiple accounts to magnify his reach, and he’s maintained this day that he’s never created fake accounts on that platform. I don’t think he has time. I’ve seen the man’s schedule. It’s not a possibility.

Leahy: He is a pretty busy guy, I’ll tell you that. That’s for sure.

Givas: It’s ridiculous. We were booted it seemingly because we released the tapes on CNN and they didn’t like the narrative and we were shut down. That’s our feeling on it. And that’s what we’re going to court for.

Leahy: What’s interesting about that, the CNN tapes, you got high level of a producer there admitting that this was just basically a Jeff Zucker vendetta to bring down President Donald Trump. That’s all it was. That’s all it is basically.

Givas: They called it propaganda and that’s frightening. And it’s not even the people a lot of people aren’t smart enough to understand this is going. It’s to see people on camera so calmly explained these things that shouldn’t be done so coldly.

These are things that should be taken into account and talked about and brought out into the light in the open. And yet here they are shrouded in darkness. And yet people are so easygoing about it when they don’t think they’re being watched, or they don’t think they are on camera.

Leahy: So what’s next for that Houston, Texas, television news reporter, Ivory Hecker? Is she currently employed? What’s her career look like?

Givas: Fox 26 is letting her go or in the process of severing her from Fox 26. Again, it was very confusing. They had asked her to turn in her equipment, but they were being very slow to kind of officially push the issue over the edge and cut her from the staff.

But she’s going to become an independent journalist no matter what happens here officially. At the end of the day, she wants to go and go chase on stories that don’t have to do with a corporate network.

Leahy: I have a message. Would you deliver a message to Ivory Hecker?

Givas: I’ll do my best. What do you have for her?

Leahy: Ivory, we’re hiring at the Star News Network, and we would love to talk to you.

Givas: Yeah, I don’t mind passing that message along.

Leahy: And by the way, my email address is simply And maybe if you could stay after the break, you could give us some contact information to our producer Scooter so we can connect with Ivory. We would love to talk to her about working with the ever-expanding Star News Network.

Givas: I’m happy to do that. And I’m sure even if just to have the contact and touch base, she’d be interested to talk to you. So I’m more than happy to pass that on.

Leahy: Terrific. Nick Givas with Project Veritas. Thanks so much for joining us today.

Givas: Thank you so much for having me. It was a pleasure.

Listen to the second hour here:

– – –

Tune in weekdays from 5:00 – 8:00 a.m. to the Tennessee Star Report with Michael Patrick Leahy on Talk Radio 98.3 FM WLAC 1510. Listen online at iHeart Radio.
Photo “Ivory Hecker” by Ivory Hecker. 













Managing Editor of Project Veritas Nick Givas Talks Twitter Ban and CNN Exposed

Managing Editor of Project Veritas Nick Givas Talks Twitter Ban and CNN Exposed


Live from Music Row Monday morning on The Tennessee Star Report with Michael Patrick Leahy – broadcast on Nashville’s Talk Radio 98.3 and 1510 WLAC weekdays from 5:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. –host Leahy welcomed Project Veritas’s Managing Editor Nick Givas to the newsmakers line to talk about their recent Twitter ban after releasing a video exposing CNN’s technical director brag about rigging and manipulating its viewers against Trump.

Leahy: We are joined on our newsmaker lined by Nick Givas, the Managing Editor of Project Veritas. Nick, welcome to The Tennessee Star Report.

Givas: All right. Thanks for having me.

Leahy: So James O’Keefe has been banned from Twitter one day after your stunning expose of the technical director of CNN who basically said what everybody knew that they were trying to defeat Donald Trump. Will James O’Keefe be suing Twitter and CNN, as some reports say?

Givas: Yes, it appears that we are going to go forward and seek our remedy in court. That’ll play out, obviously over the weeks and months ahead. But it appears that we’re going to go on offense and forge ahead with that.

Leahy: Now, James O’Keefe’s and the Project Veritas Twitter account had what, one and a half million followers?

Givas: The Veritas account may have. That was suspended before my time in joining the group. But James’s personal account was close to a million followers and was over 900,000.

Leahy: Wow. And so it looks to me like if Twitter finds a conservative that they don’t like, they just ban them. What on earth is going on with Twitter?

Givas: I can only speculate into the mind of what Jack Dorsey is thinking. I do not know. But I can say that for the grace of God and for your listeners because eventually, I believe it seems we’re on a slope or it’s not just conservatives that are going to get banned it’s anyone that gets in the way of a narrative that gets in the way that Twitter doesn’t like. you don’t have to be conservative. It could be anyone.

Carmichael: Naomi Wolf certainly is not a conservative and she was banned from Twitter.

Leahy: Yes. She has been.

Carmichael: Now, quick question. You said that you think you’re going to also in addition to suing Twitter sue CNN. What is the basis? I know that you all have exposed CNN.

Givas: Defamatory statements are the basis and I’ll leave it at that.

Carmichael: Okay, so CNN has made statements that you all believe are defamatory. And is that prior to or after your recent exposure of CNN’s deception?

Givas: I can only say stay tuned. (Leahy laughs)

Leahy: This is a wise man. There is litigation going on.

Givas: Ongoing. Ongoing.

Carmichael: Well, you have many people in your corner on your ongoing litigation. So anyway, good luck to you.

Givas: Thank you, sir. We try for the truth. That’s all we want.

Leahy: The claim by Twitter was that James O’Keefe was using fake Twitter accounts. Is that true, or did they just make that up?

Givas: He tells me no and I’ve seen and experienced nothing like that. I’ve never seen James keep or operate a false account. He says he’s never done that. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was just a reason to throw him off. But again, we’re trying to figure that out. And the answer we were given was very broad and it seemed very random all of a sudden.

         As I said, I’ll leave it to the American people. l’ll leave it to them to decide why this happened and the timing. But yes, we’ve come out with three bombshells videos showing a CNN technical director bragging about how the network is propaganda, how it manipulates people, and how it was basically shilling for Black Lives Matter. And then all of a sudden he gets banned.

Carmichael: I found what you all got them to talk about with them exaggerating the numbers on COVID.

Givas: That too. And then saying they’re going to pivot from COVID, and this is Charlie Chester, a technical producer there, claiming the network knew that people are tired of COVID and now they’re going to switch to climate change as if it’s Wheel of Fortune or some game show for them.

Carmichael: For them it is.

Givas: At least Charlie Chester, this director, and his claims that the culture is such. Let’s find out. Let’s see if anyone else is there that wants to come forward and they can send any information to And if it isn’t just him, more people will come forward. They will and it isn’t the first time.

Leahy: Nick Givas, you’re the managing editor of Project Veritas. What does the managing editor do at Project Veritas?

Givas: Without getting into too much detail I can say that I work with production on videos sometimes. What we’re going to keep and what we’re going to actually publish. Sometimes we get information that might be borderline that we have to decide as a team, are we going to publish this? Is it newsworthy? Is it true?

A part of that includes traveling on the road. Part of it includes talking to find people like yourself and just giving interviews. But people know where we are at as much as we can tell without blowing the cover of our people or interfering with their work. And in addition to that, it’s just anything and everything. I try to just work to help the company as much as I can to expose the truth. And part of that also involves things like this. We’re releasing stories such as this because we feel it’s in the public’s best interest.

Carmichael: I have a question for you that I’m just asking for your best guess if you choose to make a guess. If The New York Times produces 100 different stories and each of those stories is based on an unnamed source, how many of those stories do you think are based on a legitimate source and how many do you think are based on either no source at all or a friend of a friend of a friend who is the so-called unnamed source?

Givas: Well, that’s what we hope to find out with this lawsuit through depositions and discovery. And through this lawsuit, if we’re able to look inside The New York Times for the first time or have them answer honestly perhaps we’ll start to find out how many of those sources were real.

Carmichael: That’s right. You have a lawsuit.

Givas: We do.

Carmichael: What can you tell our listeners, if anything about that lawsuit? Because I know that you won at the New York State Supreme Court.

Givas: Yes we did. We got past the motion to dismiss and that does start to open the other side up to having to become involved in the process. The New York Times responded. We were kind of going back and forth on this so far but we do plan to have depositions, and we will depose members of The New York Times that were involved in this particular story before the court. And after that, I think the public is going to learn quite a bit about a media that they’ve trusted for years that has now decided to go into business for itself and not protecting the people and we are going to show why.

Leahy: The Project Veritas groundbreaking approach to journalism kind of addresses that problem of sort of unnamed sources, because you have pioneered the use of undercover videos. So this technical director, this Chester fellow at CNN, cannot deny what he says, because you got it there right on video.

Givas: There’s power in that. It’s visual. It’s not filtered through a lens or corporate advertisers or someone else’s opinion. It’s right there in black and white. And, yes, there is a certain power to that I think that you don’t get with digital media, or print news, or even cable news.

Carmichael: Didn’t you all win a lawsuit years ago, or somebody sued you, claiming that your method…

Givas: We’ve never lost.

Leahy: Never lost! Nick Givas, Managing Editor of Project Veritas, thanks for that first-hand report of what’s going on with that Twitter ban.

Listen to the full third hour here:

– – –

Tune in weekdays from 5:00 – 8:00 a.m. to the Tennessee Star Report with Michael Patrick Leahy on Talk Radio 98.3 FM WLAC 1510. Listen online at iHeart Radio.